‘The Case for Helmets’ for Motorcyclists

The Times advocates legal coercion (“The Case for Helmets,” Editorial, Aug. 20) to force lawful citizens against their will and rights, to an action consistent with, its choices. You would protect free citizens, (supposedly of equal status and power under the law) from their freedom of choice. What’s next? Enforced daily exercise, vitamins, diet and eight-hour sleep periods? A proscription on cigarettes, alcohol, skiing and skating?

Personal choice is the essence of living and should remain free up to the point it infringes on the rights of others. The only infringement the editorial notes is possible medical bills; that’s why we have things like insurance.

History is replete with those eager to mold others to their own will; another’s freedom, a small sacrifice, whether it’s religion ideas or a life style.

Helmets in cars would save much “more” pain and death because there are so many more drivers than motorcyclists.

KARL JOHNSON

San Fernando