Balanced Budget Amendment
- Share via
The concept of a balanced budget amendment seems to be getting far more attention than it deserves lately (May 21). Though it may sound like a cure-all, in the long run, it wouldn’t curb spending. In order for Congress to meet this amendment every year, it would do the two things we hate most--cut decent programs or raise taxes.
Why not instead propose an amendment limiting federal spending to a certain percentage of the GNP? In addition to curbing taxes relative to our ability to pay, by forcing government programs to compete for survival (instead of drone-like expansion), some parts of government might actually become efficient.
Any limitations that may arise could be handled with a clause that allows for a two-thirds override in times of crisis. This would seem to be a far better alternative.
JOHN TREADWELL, San Diego
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
