Bush Budget Calls for More Defense Spending
- Share via
President Bush seems determined to resurrect the disastrous borrow-and-spend policies of his Republican predecessors, Ronald Reagan and dear old Dad (“Bush Seeks $48-Billion Defense Hike,” Jan. 24). The U.S. already spends more on its military than all other nations on the planet combined; where is this money going? If $331 billion a year is insufficient to defend the country from a dozen guys armed with razor blades, then I’m afraid another $48 billion isn’t going to help.
Bush’s fiscal irresponsibility has already caused him to come up an astonishing $106 billion short on this year’s budget; rather than further cripple the U.S. economy with yet another ill-advised spending binge, Bush should tell his cronies in the Carlyle Group, Lockheed and Boeing: “Sorry, I already spent your $48 billion on that tax cut I gave you last year.”
Randall Smith
San Diego
*
I read with astonishment your separate articles on President Bush’s request for a $48-billion hike for defense programs and about LAUSD principals, already struggling to make ends meet, who were recently given a few hours to choose which programs they would have to eliminate from our children’s education because of the governor’s budget cuts.
What came to mind was a profound statement made by Martin Luther King Jr. in 1967: “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.” That was more than 30 years ago. I do believe we have gone into cardiac arrest.
Victoria Ballesteros
Downey
*
Re your article on the $48-billion defense hike and the budget director predicting that the 2003 deficit will be $80 billion, while Bush seeks further tax cuts: That strategy leads me to believe that I can solve my financial problems by reducing my income.
Wally Beardsell
Pacific Palisades
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.