Hurting Animals Can’t Be Justified Anywhere

Whether it was rodeo in Santa Ana (March 7) or dog fighting in Afghanistan (March 6), what was the purpose for The Times to carry such articles? Was it the intent of the writers to expose the built-in cruelty and exploitation of animals at the core of such events? Because some events are considered cultural and traditional does not make them right. The cruelty and suffering of animals cannot be accepted or applauded, and teaching children otherwise is inexcusable.

Marge Hackett

Ojai

*

Paul Watson’s article on dog-fighting spectacles in Afghanistan was not encouraging to those who support the development of a peaceful and democratic Afghanistan. Whatever the reasons for the Taliban’s attempts at suppression, the fact remains that, wherever it occurs, dog fighting is a bloody, violent and ignoble spectacle.

In Iraq, American authorities helped found institutions for the humane care of dogs and other animals, and a similar spirit is clearly needed here. We should encourage Afghan leaders and citizens to recognize that unchecked cruelty to animals is not a sign of renewed individual freedom. Such practices are low and debasing to all concerned, and they are not the mark of a free and civilized society.

Wayne Pacelle

President and CEO

The Humane Society of the United States

Washington

*

Re “Speaking for Animals With One Voice,” March 8: With the California Animal Assn.’s commitment to compromise on issues, the positive effects will compound and all animals, human and nonhuman, will benefit. Researchers are finding that nonhuman animals are more like us than we ever imagined. The better society treats its animals, the better it will treat its humans. Having empathy for animals begets empathy for humans.

Sherrill Durbin

Mounds, Okla.