Wal-Mart Loses Suit on Work Breaks
- Share via
PHILADELPHIA — Wal-Mart Stores Inc. forced employees to work through rest breaks and off the clock, violating Pennsylvania labor laws, a state jury found Thursday.
The jury, however, ruled in Wal-Mart’s favor on the claim that it denied workers meal breaks.
The jury now must decide damages in the class-action suit, which covers as many as 187,000 current and former hourly Wal-Mart workers.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers say the damages could reach $162 million.
The Bentonville, Ark.-based retail giant is facing a slew of similar suits around the country.
Wal-Mart settled a Colorado case for $50 million and was appealing a $172-million award handed out last year by a California jury.
“This is the second [verdict]. With 56 more to go, I think it reinforces that this company’s sweatshop mind-set is a serious problem, both legally and morally,” said Chris Kofinis, a spokesman for WakeUpWalMart.com, a union-funded effort to improve working conditions at the stores.
The company declined to comment because of the pending deliberations over damages.
More to Read
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.