J&J; loses most of trademark suit against Red Cross
- Share via
NEW YORK — A federal judge has tossed out most of a lawsuit in which health-products maker Johnson & Johnson claimed that the American Red Cross broke the law by licensing its famous red-and-white symbol to other companies.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, made public Thursday, is the latest blow to Johnson & Johnson in a bitter trademark battle launched in August over the use of the red cross logo, which the two entities have shared for more than a century.
Originally, the suit demanded the Red Cross stop using its emblem on healthcare products sold to the public.
A good chunk of the lawsuit was dismissed in November, but Johnson & Johnson persisted with a claim that the Red Cross, in licensing its logo to third parties, broke a federal law making it a crime for anyone to use the insignia “for the fraudulent purpose of inducing the belief that he is a member of or an agent for the American National Red Cross.”
Rakoff rejected that argument too.
The judge left intact a small part of the suit, which contends the Red Cross interfered with Johnson & Johnson’s business relationship with two healthcare supply companies, Water-Jel Technologies Inc. and First Aid Only Inc.
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
